In 1991, Naomi Wolf asked why beauty gets more complicated as women's rights advance. In 2026, the question hasn't aged a day: the myth has simply found a new mirror. Here, we revisit what still holds, and what's left to do with it.
So what exactly is the beauty myth?
the finish line keeps retreating as you advance, and no one wins a race whose distance grows with every stride
In The Beauty Myth, American journalist and feminist Naomi Wolf makes a now-landmark argument: dominant beauty standards aren't a fact of nature but a social construction. This myth works like a mirage, and that's precisely where its power lies: it keeps retreating, the finish line always shifting a little further away, no matter the effort spent chasing it. For Wolf, "beauty" is first and foremost an image, more real when frozen in a photograph or a sculpture than when fully lived.
The original text is dated 1991 by the author herself. It was reissued in 2002 in a Harper Perennial edition.
Why did women’s magazines trade the housework for the mirror?
Naomi Wolf observed it with the precision of an indictment: the women’s magazines that, in the 1950s, confined women to housework now confine them to the mirror. The apron has changed shape, but not the order written on it. We call this, euphemistically, “beauty work.”
The injunction hasn’t vanished; it has simply changed costume and picked up better marketing. Yesterday, an untidy house exposed a bad wife; today, a neglected face is said to expose a woman who doesn’t take care of herself. Same courtroom, new charge, same woman in the dock.
Does the book amount to no more than a slogan?
Reducing this book to a punchline is the excuse of those who have never opened it. Naomi Wolf builds her case chapter by chapter, moving through work, culture, religion, sex, hunger and violence: in other words, nearly everything that shapes a woman’s daily life, far beyond the makeup aisle.
Contrary to its image as a pamphlet fired off in the heat of the moment, the book is backed by extensive notes and a bibliography: this is an essay that sets out to prove something. You can argue with its conclusions, but you can't claim it boils down to a shock one-liner.
Why does comparing ourselves to images weigh so heavily on self-esteem?
Psychologist Christophe André points out that the outcome of a social comparison has less to do with the image being compared than with the resilience of the person doing the looking. When self-esteem is fragile, every comparison tips against you, and the sheer volume of images only opens the window wider through which we measure ourselves against others.
The word norm comes from the Latin norma, the builder’s square, the tool used to check whether an angle is true. Applied to a face or a body, it keeps that same cold, instrumental edge: you’re no longer looking at an image, you’re measuring a deviation. Between these two mechanisms (social comparison and the vocabulary of the square), readers can at least choose to recognise the gesture for what it is, before deciding what to do with it.
Thirty-five years haven’t been enough to wear the myth out; they’ve simply dressed it in new costumes: the filter that smooths your face before you’ve even had time to look at it, the needle now being considered at younger and younger ages. Naomi Wolf, however dated and contested she may be on other fronts, got one thing right that hasn’t aged a day: the finish line keeps retreating as you advance, and no one wins a race whose distance grows with every stride. You owe this mirage nothing. The best response isn’t to run harder; it’s to refuse to run at all: look at yourself the way you’d look at a friend you love, and the mirror stops being a courtroom and goes back to being just a mirror.
Also worth reading on La Sultane
Sonya Ben Behi, Bookstagrammer and Serial Reader
Dr. Leila Lakhoua Houimli: Consistency, Elegance & Competence
